Recent work in fMRI supports the presence of two large-scale brain networks whose coupling is critical for optimal cognitive function: the “task-positive” network comprised of regions typically activated during task performance (dorsal ACC, lateral parietal, dorsolateral prefrontal), and the DMN comprised of regions activated when no task is performed and deactivated during a task (rostral ACC, precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex) (Fox et al. 2005). Our results could be interpreted as patients showing

less task-induced deactivation in regions of the DMN, as others have with other tasks (Whitfield-Gabrieli et al. 2009; Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical Jeong and Kubicki 2010). Interestingly, a lack of deactivation in precuneus and posterior cingulate was also observed during the Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical DD task in the inconsistent SZ compared with HC, suggesting this finding is not

related to task consistency. The insula, a region consistently found abnormal in past structural and functional imaging studies in SZ (Wylie and Tregellas 2010; Palaniyappan and Liddle 2012), was more activated in consistent SZ compared with HC. The insula is Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical part of the “somatic marker” network of brain areas showing increased activity during more emotional decisions (Damasio 1994). It is possible that performance of the DD task is emotionally more taxing for patients than for HC. Along with the ACC, the insula has recently been implicated in a network whose role is to enable the switch between the task positive and DMN (Menon Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and Uddin 2010). Reduced deactivation of regions of the DMN and abnormal insular/ACC activation might suggest disrupted coupling between brain networks. We also compared the groups on activation based on task difficulty. On the hard>easy comparison, a contrast thought to tap more specifically into executive function, we did not identify any regions significantly activated

in the HC or SZ groups, unlike the results of Marco-Pallares et al. (2010) and Kishinevsky et al. (2012). Interestingly though, in our study, the reverse contrast of easy>hard trials revealed widespread cortical activation Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical in both groups, similar to results reported by Marco-Pallares et al. (2010). They found activation in multiple regions corresponding to our sellekchem within-group results, such as the insula, middle cingulate gyrus, middle temporal cortex, and posterior parietal cortex. These authors characterized some of these regions as Anacetrapib related to reward, which would apply to the insula activation in our study. We identified an interaction between groups and trial difficulty in a large cluster prominently comprising the dACC/medial frontal cortex. In that region, both groups exhibited greater activation to the easy trials compared with the hard trails; however, the difference between easy and hard trials was larger in SZ. Because the function of the dACC/medial frontal cortex has been consistently linked to conflict monitoring (Kerns et al. 2005; Melcher et al. 2008; Reid et al.