The term “animal model” is unfortunate; models should be viewed with a broader perspective, as reagents to probe specific questions about etiological and pathophysiological

pathways. It is remarkable that most developmental and genetic models of schizophrenia do have in common a disinhibited cortex (O’Donnell, 2012). Whether the animals were exposed in utero to an antimitotic agent, immune activation, or knockdown of the DISC1 gene (Giovanoli et al., 2013, Lodge et al., 2009 and Niwa et al., 2010), adult animals show loss of parvalbumin immunoreactivity and altered prefrontal and hippocampal physiology. Similar findings are obtained with other genetic models and with a neonatal ventral hippocampal lesion (O’Donnell, 2012). These observations ISRIB purchase reinforce the notion that affecting

developmental trajectories could alter adult excitation-inhibition balance in a manner similar to what noncompeting NMDA antagonists do in cortical circuits (Homayoun and Moghaddam, 2007). The study by Suh et al. (2013) provides further insight into the impact of forebrain alterations that are related to NMDA receptor function, such as calcineurin, on complex physiological patterns of critical relevance to cognition. Further this website studies with this and other animal models will be essential to gain a more thorough understanding of the neurobiological substrates of cognitive deficits that have been so elusive. “
“David Hubel was a giant in our field, yet he was warm, friendly, new and humble in person. He and Torsten Wiesel, following in the footsteps of their mentor Steve Kuffler, discovered fundamental principles of information processing in the brain and fundamental principles of how the brain wires itself up. I think many people in the field see David as a formidable figure, but since I saw him every day in the lab, that is the person I will remember here. After all, it is the guy in the lab who

did the work that made him great, and there is surely some connection between the way he daily went about doing science and how successful he was. David Hubel 1926–2013 David always saw himself as lucky, as having simply been in the right place at the right time. But I think two characteristics I saw all the time, his mechanical inventiveness and his perseverance, were more important than luck. He and Torsten started recording in visual cortex when there was hardly anyone else doing that. But the reason they could do this is because David had invented the tungsten microelectrode, which allowed them to record from single neurons, not axons, which is what people had been recording with glass pipettes, and David had invented a way of sealing the electrode advancer to the cortex so that cortical pulsations did not prevent them from holding single units long enough to characterize them.