2.0 selleckchem and known as

OPAQ—Physical Function (OPAQ-PF), which could be used in clinical trials to evaluate the impact of new osteoporosis treatments on patients’ outcomes. Initially, we sought to develop a measure of the impact of osteoporosis on the dimensions of physical functioning, fear of falling, independence, and symptoms. However, this objective was re-evaluated and modified based on the interim results, and the instrument was refocused on physical function only. This paper describes the development of OPAQ-PF. Methods The study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1: item elimination Phase 1 consisted of a post hoc analysis of data generated when the 60-item OPAQ v.2.0 was administered, at the study baseline visit, to 1,478 patients enrolled in the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) trial [15]. This phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized

clinical trial enrolled ambulatory, postmenopausal women aged ≤80 years with a diagnosis of osteoporosis (defined as the presence of vertebral fractures or a femoral neck or vertebral spine T-score of ≤−2.5) [15]. Each of the 60 items was analyzed using item response theory (IRT) methodology. First, exploratory factor analysis was used to confirm unidimensionality of each of the 14 domains independently. For each domain, a scree plot was used to determine (-)-p-Bromotetramisole Oxalate whether only Y-27632 chemical structure one construct was being measured in MORE clinical trial population. Next, two sets of graphs (item characteristic curves [ICCs] and item information curves [IICs]) were

generated to demonstrate how well items reflected the concept being measured, to provide graphical representations of the floor and ceiling effects of patient responses to each item, and to act as a focus for discussing the clinical relevance of the measured concepts (data not shown). The ICCs were used to assess each item’s ability to discriminate Selleckchem ML323 across the continuum of the underlying construct experienced by patients. The extent to which each item was related to the underlying construct, and the range over which the item could distinguish responses, were determined using the IICs. Analyses were conducted using Mplus (Muthén and Muthén, Los Angeles, CA, USA) statistical software. More information on IRT methodology can be found in the article by Edelen and Reeve [16]. Items and responses were modified or subdivided, if necessary, and new items and responses could be added. Criteria for retaining items included: good IRT item performance (based on visual assessment of ICCs and IICs); good discrimination within a wide range of the construct; clinical relevance as assessed by two of the authors (SS, DTG); and construct relevance.