, 2013). In the current study, PD0325901 solubility dmso these fixational eye movements are more pronounced in ASD, due to slow drifts, as no significant differences in estimates of microsaccades were found between groups. It is extremely unlikely that the small differences (< 2 min of arc) in the standard deviation of eye position could account for the differences in amplitude of visual evoked responses observed here. Recall that the stimuli used herein subtended fully 6° of visual space, and this variance between groups is two orders of magnitude smaller. Further, the same levels of eye-position variability were also observed

for centrally presented stimuli where we found no differences in evoked response between groups. In recent years a number of studies have provided evidence for common generators of saccades and microsaccades (Martinez-Conde et al., 2013). The observed higher variability of eye position during fixation in the ASD participants might therefore

mirror studies that reported problems in oculomotor control for saccadic eye movements (Goldberg et al., 2002; Takarae et al., 2004; Stanley-Cary et al., 2011), with higher variability of landing positions in ASD participants. While an altered cortical representation account of the present findings is the most parsimonious with existing evidence in our view, there are other explanations that should be considered. When humans deploy attention covertly, stimuli JQ1 at the attended

Tau-protein kinase peripheral location receive enhanced processing. This commonly results in greater P1 amplitudes in VEP (Hillyard & Anllo-Vento, 1998; Kelly et al., 2008) and VESPA studies (Frey et al., 2010). Therefore, one possibility is that ASD participants covertly attended the peripherally presented stimuli, or maintained a broader focus of attention than their neurotypical peers. A purely attentional account, however, seems unlikely. We employed an attention-demanding central task during peripheral stimulation. Because neither behavioral performance nor eye-tracking measures differed between ASD and TD groups, it seems likely that both deployed attention equally to the central fixation task. Cortical remapping could account for a number of reported results on visual functioning in autism. For example, it has been reported that individuals with autism exhibit superior performance in visual search tasks (Plaisted et al., 1998; O’Riordan et al., 2001). Such a pattern of results could be explained by an enhanced representation of peripheral space, allowing individuals with ASD to explore their visual environment more efficiently. Another finding that could potentially relate to enhanced representation of peripheral space is lateral glance behavior (Mottron et al., 2007), frequently exhibited by a subpopulation of children with ASD.