All subjects wore

a heart-rate monitor during the training sessions to ensure that exercise intensity was moderate to vigorous (Ramírez-Vélez et al 2009). Sessions consisted of walking (10 min), aerobic exercise (30 min), learn more stretching (10 min), and relaxation (10 min). Aerobic activities were prescribed at moderate to vigorous intensity, aiming for 55–75% of maximal heart rate and adjusted according to ratings on the Borg scale (Borg 1982). Adherence to the exercise program was encouraged by the physiotherapist who supervised the exercise sessions. In order to maximise adherence to the training program, all sessions were conducted in groups of 3 to 5 women, accompanied by music, and performed in a spacious, air-conditioned room. The control group received no exercise intervention, did not attend the exercise classes, and did not

take part in a home exercise program. Both groups continued with their normal prenatal care (1 session per week for 3 months) and physical activity. The Colombian standard version of the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12 version 2) beta-catenin mutation is a questionnaire comprising 12 questions grouped into eight different domains of health: physical functioning, role limitation due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social function, role limitation due to emotional problems, and mental health (Lugo et al 2006). These eight scales are further clustered Carnitine palmitoyltransferase II into the Physical Component Summary (comprising physical function, role-physical, bodily pain and general health) and Mental Component Summary (comprising vitality, social function, role-emotional, and mental health). Test scores were calculated according to the instructions provided in the questionnaire’s user manual (Ware and Kosinski 2001, Lugo et al 2006). Reliability values (Pearson’s r) range from 0.89 to 0.94 for the Physical Component Summary and from 0.84 to 0.91 for the Mental Component Summary (Bize et al 2007, Ware and Kosinski 2001, Tessier et al 2007). Our sample size of 64 participants provided 80% power to detect

as significant, at the two-sided 5% level, a 3-point difference in the Physical Component Summary between groups, assuming a SD of 5 points (Ramírez-Vélez et al 2009) and allowing for a loss to follow-up of 25%. Data were entered in an electronic database by investigators at the time of assessment. Random checks of data entry were performed regularly and corrections made where possible by checking against hospital records or by phoning participants for confirmation. The normality of the distribution of scores for each variable was confirmed with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. We then used the unpaired t-test to estimate the between-group difference in each outcome. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.