Here, we focus on the latter two sources of variation: tissue-to-source isotopic fractionation and isotopic turnover rates. For tissue-to-source fractionations, we consider

carbon AZD4547 supplier and nitrogen, which are supplied by diet, separately from oxygen, which is largely supplied by ingested water. We lay out general patterns that might be expected from studies of other mammals and birds, but highlight whenever possible studies of marine mammals. A clear understanding of the tissue-to-diet isotope discrimination for a species is critical for interpreting ecological information from tissue isotope values. The magnitude of these fractionations can vary as a result of differences in metabolic routing of dietary components between tissues (e.g., lipids, proteins, and carbohydrates), variation in an animal’s growth rate and the nutritional quality of its diet, differences in the amino acid or lipid composition of tissues, and the interplay between these factors and temporal variation in the ecology and physiology of marine mammals. We discuss the impact of each of these factors on nitrogen and carbon isotope tissue-to-diet discrimination below. The dominant source

of nitrogen in marine mammals is dietary protein. An increase Selleck AZD2014 in δ15N value with each trophic step has been recognized across taxonomic groups and food webs (typically +2‰–+5‰ for each increase in trophic level; Minagawa and Wada 1984, Kelly 2000, Vanderklift and Ponsard 2003). Trophic discrimination is thought to relate to excretion of urea and other nitrogenous wastes that are 15N-depleted relative to body nitrogen pools. Isotopic fractionation of nitrogen occurs during deamination and transamination reactions flowing into and out of the TCA cycle and in the recycling of urea within the body (see review and modeling study by Balter et al.

2006). Dietary protein quantity and quality can also influence the magnitude of isotopic fractionation (Robbins et al. 2005); both models and limited data suggest that Δ15Ntissue-diet decreases with increasing dietary protein quality, but increases with increasing dietary protein quantity (Martínez del Rio et al. 2009). Based Selleckchem Nutlin3 on differences in protein quantity, we might expect higher discriminations in carnivorous marine mammals (cetaceans, pinnipeds) than in herbivorous species (sirenians). Predictions related to differences in protein quantity vs. quality are more difficult to generate within these broad feeding categories. Δ15Ntissue-diet values for pinnipeds, the only group of marine mammals on which controlled feeding experiments have been conducted, are relatively consistent across taxa and are in the +3‰–+5‰ range commonly observed in studies of terrestrial carnivores (Table 3). Analyzing different tissues in captive phocids fed an isotopically homogenous diet, Hobson et al. (1996) found that Δ15N values range from 1.7‰ for red blood cells to 3.1‰ for liver.