melitensis 16 M at different phases of growth to invade HeLa cell

melitensis 16 M at different phases of growth to invade HeLa cells. (A) Growth curve of B. melitensis 16 M grown overnight in tubes with loose lids and shaking in F12K cell culture medium supplemented with 10% (v/v)

HI-FBS. Results are the average +/- SD of 3 independent experiments. Mid-log, late-log and stationary growth phases are marked with *. (B) HeLa cell infections were performed at MOI 1,000:1 for 30 min. The intracellular number of late-log growth phase cultures of B. melitensis was significantly different from those grown to mid-log (* = P < 0.05) and stationary (** = P < 0.01) growth phases. Results are presented as the number of CFU from internalized bacteria 30 min post-infection per 103 cells inoculated. Data presented are

the mean +/- SD (error bars) of triplicate samples from 3 independent experiments. Whole-genome expression analysis of the most and the least B. melitensis 16 M invasive growth phases: Reliability Selleckchem Buparlisib of array data To analyze the molecular differences CB-5083 clinical trial between the most and the least invasive phenotype, four biological replicates of cultures at late-log and stationary growth phases were analyzed using cDNA microarrays. Genomic DNA was used as an internal control for each experiment in order to allow experiment-to-experiment comparisons [15]. As expected, there was little variability between gDNA signals from array to array, even under the two different conditions examined (i.e., late-log and stationary growth phases). The R2 value for any two arrays (for gDNA Cy5 fluorescent values) was between 0.78 and 0.89, even before normalization. When the find more values for each conditional replicate were averaged (four arrays each for late-log phase and stationary growth phases), the resulting R2 value was 0.88 [see Additional file 1]. Comparisons of RNA Cy3 fluorescent signals (late-log versus late-log phases and stationary versus stationary phases) yielded similar R2 values (data not shown). In order to further minimize the incidence of false positives and increase the consistency Selleck Paclitaxel and reliability of the microarray analysis results, the data were analyzed separately using four different techniques: GeneSpring combinatorial

analysis, Spotfire DecisionSite 8.2 pairwise comparisons, SAM two-class unpaired comparisons, and ANOVA. A change in gene expression was considered significant if the P value was less than 0.05, the fold-change was at least 2.0, and the gene expression alteration occurred for all replicate experiments. We further expected each gene to be significantly differentially expressed for at least two of the three replicate spots for each experimental array set (stationary versus late-log phases). Based on these criteria, genes that were deemed significant by all four analytical methods (GeneSpring, Spotfire DecisionSite 8.2, SAM, and ANOVA) were organized by COGs functional categories [16] and compiled into a list that included 454 genes (different loci) that were up- or down-regulated when B.

Comments are closed.