PLGA microsphere-based vaccines have been described in the literature and their limitations have been discussed. In particular, it has been pointed out that the tertiary structure of the delivered antigen may degrade due to exposure to solvents used in double-emulsion sphere fabricating technologies, high temperatures used during spray drying processes,

or incompatibility with excipients [30]. We manufactured our microspheres avoiding double emulsion sphere manufacturing technology using a precision spray drying process that operates at room temperature [15]. In addition, because we are LY294002 delivering the epitopes themselves and not a large protein antigen, tertiary structure stability in the formulation is not an issue, as our results demonstrate. Kanchan has reported the potential effect of particle size on the immune response stating that nano-sized particles may be more likely to produce a cellular immune response compared with micron-sized spheres [31]. However, in a review article, Agaki concludes that more studies http://www.selleckchem.com/products/PD-0332991.html with precisely sized spheres will be required to fully understand the relationship between the size and activity of vaccine-loaded biodegradable spheres [32]. Here, we sought

to use microspheres sized near the diameter of a dendritic cell and found that class I epitopes could indeed elicit a cytotoxic T-lymphocyte response in mice and have contradicted the notion that large microspheres are not suited for this purpose as has been suggested [31]. Aluminum salts have been widely used as vaccine adjuvants but may not be effective in vaccines Fossariinae relying on T-cell activation [33]. Here we explored the use of other adjuvants and demonstrated that CpG within the microsphere and MPLA in the injectate enhanced

T-cell activation. This is an important finding since MPLA has been used within PLGA microspheres for vaccine design previously and others have suggested that placing MPLA within the microsphere is the preferred approach [13], [14] and [26]. The only TLR agonist being used in an FDA approved vaccine (Cervarix) is MPLA (TLR-4 agonist). TLR-9 has been used in FDA cleared US clinical trials [34]. Because of this clinical history, we evaluated the potential beneficial effect of both of these adjuvants in our vaccine design. In our experiments, we measured immune responses by interferon gamma release. Additional work should be done to demonstrate cytolytic activity (see, e.g., [14]) and antiviral efficacy. Further work will be required to study the residence time of the phagocytosed microspheres within the antigen presenting cells and to characterize the minimum microsphere size at which a substantial immune response is seen.