The indicators for both condition quality (three indicators) and trend (three indicators) were: Most (the modal score/grade for places, samples, or examples, measured

or expected in the spatial distribution of the quality/trend), and the Best10% and Worst10% of the distribution (the score/grade at the 90% and 10% points respectively in the selleck products estimated spatial frequency distribution). Each condition indicator was assigned an estimated score (range 0–10), set within four performance grades—Very Poor, Poor, Good, Very Good. Trend indicators were assigned as Improving (in current 5 year condition quality of the component: 2005–2010), Stable, or Deteriorating. For both condition and trend in each component, experts also were invited to assign a grade of High, Medium, or Low to their confidence in assigning a score (condition) or grade (trend). Guidance for interpretation of these terms and their scores/grades (the Grading Statements) was agreed with the workshop participants in advance of the workshops (Table 2). The components of pressure in the typology were set at a high level (compared to the biodiversity and ecosystem health equivalents), and restricted to the main types

of pressures and their sources. The pressure indicators were assigned scores and grades in the same manner as for biodiversity and ecosystem health. However, the grading scale assigned to pressures was constructed to reflect the importance of the impact of the pressure on biodiversity/ecosystem health, so that scores would have a Raf inhibitor standardised inference across all indicators—a low score always indicates an undesirable outcome, and conversely, a high score always indicates a more desirable outcome from a biodiversity perspective (Table 2). The indicators were populated with information derived from expert judgement established through the assessment process

discussed below. Scores for the Best10% and Worst10% indicators for condition were initially selected (at the workshop) to act as scoring range ‘anchors’, providing an upper and lower bound of the possible range for their scores. Then the modal score (Most) was assigned within this range. Rather than choosing the extremes of the range (the most extreme single example of the component), the 90% and 10% points in the frequency distribution of scores for a component were these considered to be more appropriate metrics for which a more reliable estimate could be secured, with greater utility for policy setting purposes. The reference point for these indicators, against which current (5 year: 2005–2010) condition and trend is judged and a score/grade assigned, was chosen as the time of European settlement of the Australian mainland (around 1800). There are few environmental data from that time that could be deployed in a rigorous comparison to quantitatively or qualitatively estimate a score/grade of current condition.