The initial aim was to recruit 44 cases with 3 matched controls p

The initial aim was to recruit 44 cases with 3 matched controls per case. We calculated this sample size with an alpha error of 0.05 and 80% power to detect a 3-fold

difference in proportions between cases and controls, assuming a prevalence of 10% exposure among control subjects.16 Controls were matched to cases by age group (55-59, 60-69, and ≥70 years) and postal code of residence. Potential controls were selected from the general population using random selection of residential telephone numbers from internet-based reverse look-up directories. Advance letters were sent to selected households, with subsequent telephone screening against the applicable age requirements. Exclusion criteria for controls included residence in a nursing home, history of HBV or HCV infection, or lifetime history of hepatitis B vaccination. https://www.selleckchem.com/products/ly2109761.html The study Imatinib protocol was approved by the institutional review boards at the CDC and the participating health departments. Case patients and control subjects were contacted by telephone and provided verbal informed consent before enrollment. Data, including behavioral and healthcare-related exposures that occurred in the 6 months before symptom onset (cases) or before the date of interview (controls), were collected from consenting study participants. To confirm reported exposures and identify healthcare encounters not reported during participant

interviews, we also sought additional informed consent from participants to review their medical records. Information from medical charts was abstracted using a standardized form for the subset of participants that gave their consent. Healthcare encounter data from participant interviews were examined to identify

potential contradictory responses. For example, 9 (4%) participants indicated they had undergone cardiac catheterization or colonoscopy, but also reported they had not received anesthesia. In these instances, available information was reviewed in detail, and, where deemed appropriate unless (i.e., where it was unlikely an invasive procedure was performed without sedation or anesthesia), data were changed to indicate that the participant did receive anesthesia. In addition, data were changed in instances where medical chart review was performed and identified procedures that participants had not reported or indicated that a reported procedure actually occurred outside the relevant 6-month exposure period. These changes were recorded in a separate dataset and analyzed separately from the dataset that contained unaltered interview responses. Demographic information for eligible cases was used to compare enrolled and nonenrolled cases. Univariate measures of association were obtained using chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests. Adjusted measures of association comparing cases and their matched controls were obtained using multivariate conditional logistic regression models.

Comments are closed.