These six items are coded on 5-point scales ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly

disagree”. The items for the perceived clarity of values subscale are: “I am clear about which benefits matter most to me”, “I am clear about which risks and side effects matter most to me”, and “I am clear about which is more important to me (the benefits or the risk and side effects)”. The uncertainty subscale items are: “I am clear about the best choice for me”, “I feel sure about what to choose”, and “This decision is easy for me to make”. In a preliminary pilot study of 60 persons used to test the survey was working correctly, approximately 65% of participants chose an option concordant with their values. A convenience TGF-beta signaling sample of 500 individuals (approximately 166 in each arm) was therefore calculated to be able to detect a 15% difference with 80% power, at a type I error of 5%. We advertised both the pilot and main survey to North American participants using Amazon Mechanical Turk [23]. A generalized logit model for multinomial responses was used to determine the odds ratio for choosing either CPAP or MAS relative to the conventional group. A logistic regression was used to test for differences in concordance between each group, adjusted for age, sex, and education. Each DCS subscale was converted to

a 1–100 score where a lower score meant the participant was less conflicted, and linear regression models were performed to compare the scores relative to the conventional group, adjusted for age, sex, and education. All analyses were conducted in buy GSK458 Rucaparib SAS 8.2. In just over two weeks, 643 individuals began the survey. Of these, 76 respondents failed to complete the survey, and a further 35 failed the catch trial. Eleven respondents had duplicate IP addresses and similar characteristics and so their second response was removed. This left 521 responses available

for analysis (Fig. 1). In the total sample, respondents were predominantly aged between 26 and 35 years, 61% were female, and approximately 60% of respondents had at least a college degree. The demographics were generally well balanced between groups (Table 1). On average, respondents considered the efficacy of treatment to be the most important attribute, followed by cost, partner considerations, and comfort. Side effects and practicality were the least valued. However, there was considerable heterogeneity between respondents’ values and in the ordered groups (2 and 3) there were 112 unique rank orderings. Consequently, few respondents in these groups viewed the same version of the PtDA; there were effectively 112 individually tailored versions. Overall, respondents stated they preferred the MAS option, followed by CPAP and no treatment (Table 2). In comparison to the conventional group, respondents randomized to the primacy ordering tended to prefer MAS over no treatment (OR (95% CI): 1.87 (1.09, 3.22)).