A diagnostic attribution should tell the clinician how to treat the patient and what the prognostic expectations might be. Both requirements are not fulfilled by current diagnostic schemes, and major depression has been used as a diagnostic monolith, while in reality it is a catch-all phrase for syndromes with highly variable underlying pathologies.8 This may work as long as the antidepressant drugs are mechanistically unspecific comparable to broad-spectrum antibiotics, where the disease-causing bacteria are not known. However, once more specific mechanisms are targeted by novel antidepressants, much more information Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical is needed
to treat the right patient with the right drug.9 Thus, the current lack of diagnostic tools that would allow one Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical to stratify patients according to objective signs and symptoms and underlying causal mechanisms is key to the reluctant position of the industry. Targeting the stress hormone system The past experiences of the pharmaceutical industry with CRHRl-antagonists illustrate this dilemma: in the 1980s the long sought-after corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) was isolated and characterized by the late Wylie Vale. Among
other important Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical findings it was shown, in transgenic mice either overexpressing CRH or carrying deletions of the relevant type 1 receptor (CRHR1) through which CRH acts in the brain, that enhanced CRH signaling via CRHR1 is most likely one important mechanism that may cause depression. This view is particularly plausible, as many patients with depression Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical have overactive
stress hormone secretions as evidenced by elevated plasma cortisol and corticotropin concentrations, prior to or after dexamethasone administration and exaggerated responses of these hormones to the combined dexamethasone/CRH test. Importantly, CRH was found to be elevated also in the cerebrospinal fluid in about 30% of patients with major depression. These and many other findings Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical encouraged pharmaceutical companies to develop non-peptidergic CRHR1 antagonists that are orally available and can penetrate into the brain where they are believed to reduce CRH/CRHR1 signaling.10 After the first promising explorative study, all these newly EPZ004777 in vitro developed CRHR1 antagonists showed negative results in controlled efficacy trials. Indeed, the jury is out as to whether these trials were really negative or rather failed, because a drug that specifically binds to nothing else but however CRHR1 can only work among those patients where enhanced CRH signaling is causing the disease. Thus, without knowing in which patients this is the case and assuming that only 20% to 30% of depressives have CRH overactivity, we might treat a vast majority of patients with the wrong drug, if we give it to all of them. But how could one figure out who is having a “CRH problem”? In the light of this, the negative study results were unsurprising.